Guttenberg, the plagiarist is how it slowly but surely me this
ene hypocritical hypocritical debate on the mind. I seldom met such a mendacious argument and I've never been drawn, it is not seen clearly discernible consequences. My God, because this wimp absolutely no ass in the pants? How low can you go, how long can you lie to yourself and the public ??.....
Yes, I admit it! In the beginning, when the news was all still fresh in, I enjoyed themselves immensely, laughed loudly and got the virtual popcorn out of the closet. A mixture of malice, ridicule and scorn. Of all our super-minister, our dynamic Mr. Clean, which some was almost at the chancellery imagined that caught his Summa cum Laude, the thesis, a bold Fake. Divine, it would not be the reality, no comedian could have come up with, the better. Pure satire, writing stories as only life. As can be learned as a screenwriter in Hollywood a lot.
In reading his "work" I noticed that she somehow does not sound to a lawyer who writes about constitutional law. It reads more like the work of a historian of the already long in the business, and is now even trying to write a popular book. When reading the way, the stylistic differences are quite striking.
Was it at the beginning or at some "passages" to some forgotten "references" to some "forgotten" footnotes turned out (especially thanks to the collaborative Internet community) quickly the whole thing is a bad plagiarism. Under no circumstances one should proceed from here a few small oversights, a "few" forgotten footnotes, but everything points to a conscious falsification. Here you can even see the main points --->
http://de.guttenplag.wikia.com/wiki/Herausragende_Fundstellen
I'm surprised it even excluding that of the Lord Ministers will have no knowledge of it, it is guaranteed the work of a ghost writer. Too bad he sue this little impostor can not. This argument before a court I would have liked ....
are now 286 (ie 72.77%) points as plagiarism known. (As of 02/21/2011). Quite regardless of the necessary academic debate about the formalities of a dissertation and to the "pseudo-scientific value of this" work "that goes to me for something else. Everyone knows that a thesis without a second state examination of the record is not an academic but intended only as a stepping stone and door opener is. A blend tool can do for those who like to be dazzled by titles and offices, and those were in Germany has always been a whole lot of people.
The man, whose website (link
) decorated by a giant portrait is on in large letters is "obliged responsibility," should themselves take on that. He has shown all over the country that he is only a small blender, one of which the "Leistunglos" want to succeed. Much better you can not prove his unfitness of character. No one would have judged his abilities differently if he had no doctorate fraudulently. Someone with such a character can never be an open, honest and transparent policy on behalf of and in Interest of his constituents (and the rest of the country) are. There is only a consequence of this: HE MUST RESIGN!
Everything else would be to give anyone. The majority of the population keeps our politicians today lifted for unrealistic and elitist, as far is the arrogance towards the people go?
have not given up yet, however, his "fans" their KTG. By all means, there are the usual smearing propaganda of pro-Guttenberg Group. They want large parts of the German press identified a majority of the population to remain Guttenberg's are in office. Hähh? What the guys at Emnid have paid the respondents? Or are the participants in the study had been drugged at all?, They are threatened by the intelligence? Hiermal a properly designated quotation from the Stuttgarter Zeitung
: Show
The first surveys that do not hold the majority of the citizens of the Defence Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, a fraud. In an Emnid poll for the "Focus" is said only 27 percent for a resignation of the minister. 57 percent do not consider him a fraud, as a further Emnid survey for "Bild am Sonntag newspaper. 47 percent believe, however, that Guttenberg returns a doctorate - although it is unclear whether this is legally possible.
a clear case of "parallel society". Such an obvious case of manipulation of opinion that a smooth roll with emotion a few little tears down the cheek like. My comment: Shabby!
Who behind the Facebook site "
PRO-Guttenberg " infection can be seen here in "
Wikipedia " times. Since one can be bad.
you read but the comments of readers on the pages of the newspaper come since then, things like this review of the reader "Skeptiker01"
"E pluribus unum," From many, one "- that was the motto of the introduction of the thesis of Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg 2007th "A motto that is to be understood programmatically." And as the introduction, the (Mach) business. It is increasingly clear: The "summa cum laude" thesis of the C & P is a scientist KTvuzG Zitatenpampe without significant scientific own contribution collected by the parliamentary office of the Bundestag. Mr. Baron have "help" to allow for promotion. When the University of Bayreuth him his Dr. jur. but knows it is her anyway verdaddeln already tarnished reputation completely.
It is time to go, und in Abwandlung eines Satzes auf Seite 6 der glorreichen "Arbeit" des Freiherrn zu Guttenberg sage ich Ihnen: "Verpassen sie nicht zum wiederholten Male den Kairos und lassen Sie die notwendige Unbedingtheit des Gestaltungswillen erkennen!!"
