There is a new distance between the rulers and the governed. In the population creates a rebellious spirit. The whole project Stuttgart 21 can not be explained. They say the Hartz-IV-recipient, you have no money, there is not more than five euros. They say their parents' money should be deleted. They decide on a large scale social cuts and elsewhere you say that of course we have ten billion for an underground train station. The people do not understand easily. And I think that's understandable. Then the police action: The demonstrations were peaceful, and then these totally disproportionate use of force by the police. There are political leaders. If you do not make a contribution to ensuring that those responsible be held responsible and then you destroy the relationship of trust with the people - not only in Stuttgart.
There is already no longer a train station. The question is not how reasonable is really Stuttgart 21, how high the costs will be. It raises the question as legitimate "democratic" and "legally" adopted projects of our democracy. Are the decisions of parliaments and courts at the "people" by only a political expression of an Arrogant "class", or is there more to it? With a "distance" of the politicians of the people all have to do anything more long ago, but it is the wish of the economic "powerful" for a "soft" form of fascism!
democracy is today only as a "disadvantage" considered. The decisions of parliaments, governments and courts take the men's business too long. Too many considerations must be taken from time to time you have to even before the "unwillingness" of voters in eight assume the "administrator" of the Republic (which implement the decisions of the economy in "parliaments"!) Do indeed re-elected, finally be. Oh, what need for the "wonderful" conditions in China, are Saudi Arabia and other dictatorships? Absolutely ideal conditions, as the trains roll on, while we have the plan approval process nor in the first Instance is determined.
is no wonder that even Professor Münkler, holder of the chair of "Theory of Politics" at the Institute of Social Sciences at Humboldt University in Berlin, in his article " The false luster of dictatorship "on the website of International Affairs (www.internationalepolitik.de) Notes:
The uneasiness with democracy comes from the slowness of the process, the slowness of decision making, the defects in the selection of political personnel, the widespread tendency of politicians, the things around excuses, because they fear to be punished politically for speaking truths, including the influence of political parties and interest groups. If there is bad, this suggests unease in the hope for a superb individual, take the quick and clear decisions and then enforce that decided to quickly. The desire for "a little dictatorship" comes to democratic feet and waives vociferous anti-democratic rhetoric behind.And he writes
is the key question: Is it beyond the legal order legitimacy reserves tapped and taken advantage will be able to rejuvenate a come in the years right?
That was also before, in the good old days in which so many of our grandfathers remembered so much. At that time, the Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt wrote on methods of justice in the Weimar Republic. Schmitt distinguished the legitimacy (positive law to comply with a higher standard) of the legality (compliance of positive law). He took in the last years of the Weimar Republic, THE VIEW, legality and legitimacy do not match, and was preparing his thesis for the Protection of the dictatorship legitimacy could be necessary, including the Nazi regime way. (Link: " Heise.de )
Thus one understands why a lot more MP Mappus when he visited Saudi Arabia and Qatar, where it is laughed at on-site only. Here a quote from the "Pforzheimer Zeitung:
" I admire how they manage to make the middle of the desert, a land under cultivation and to make progress, "he says. The countries are in a weird way and pace it would have great interest in an exchange with countries such as Baden-Württemberg. "And the lives of them that we can keep up with the pace of development, and I'm sometimes worried independently of 'Stuttgart 21' "
Yes there is the Good envious and secretly wish for such conditions for our Republic. Should only come afterwards and say no we were not warned. These are the wet dreams of the business heads of the banana republic of Germany. The Pforzheimer Zeitung continues:
shows Once there, the Baden-Württemberg's Prime Minister surprised at the innovation of his Arab interlocutors. "We admire speed with which they approach and implement projects" he repeated continually. At the same time issued a general Mappus building freeze in Stuttgart again clearly rejected (source : http://www.pz-news.de/ )
the way, the reasons why Mappus on behalf of the economy at our expense through the Middle East has to travel - I will not ask for better, otherwise I feel bad.
all for the sake of democracy. It's just tick but only "list", nothing more. have you thought of a dictatorship by the people, a genuine people's democracy, and is likely not even the old "Marx" well. Remains at the end but probably just an economic fascism. Brave new world that nobody wants. The protests will continue, not only in Stuttgart, all over the world. Also, new laws that restrict freedom of speech and turn the Internet into a monitored zone will be unable to stop the people. The Stasi would be proud of this democracy. Even if one day of the Left calls but finally admitting it was an unjust state, the GDR, some methods still enjoy our American friends all the rage, z.Bsp. the Berlin Wall! (Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20020018-503544.html ) How should we be really stupid to recognize not, all of which benefit the economy will be implemented? No man in this world is interested in what the mob wants, not one. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment